Because it’s Friday: Visual News

Back to the regular Friday them of how we make things more visual, today’s example is – the news.

Newsmap has been around in beta for a little while, but I’ve never written about it. Here is the news for today (4th November 2011 at 8:20) for the UK in visual form:

image

It’s not the only visual news site out there, but I like this one.

I have to admit though, it always makes me slightly sad, while many of these things are really important, some of the things that get people attention are not important at all.

On a lighter note: It always manages to highlight something I hadn’t seen, and that’s exciting for an information addict.

Work – Life Balance

There are times in life when we can see our life clearly, at other times we need someone to remind us of the reality of a situation.

AbbeysteadNigel Marsh’s TED talk on the subject was for me a great reality check.

Some quotes that struck me:

Certain job and career choices are fundamentally incompatible with being being meaningfully engaged on a day to day basis with a young family.

There are thousands and thousands of people out there leading lives of quiet desperation.

Governments and corporations aren’t going to solve this issue for us.

If you don’t design your life someone else will and you might not like their idea of balance.

We need to avoid the trap of “I’ll have a life when I retire”.

Nigel is passionate about his subject and rightly so – it’s a significant issue for our society.

In the same room, but not together

I recently confessed a whole set of things that I’ve noticed myself doing within a work context that are, quite frankly, rude.

Jimmy and Granddad Twittering on the BlackBerryAnother day, another conference call, another set of instant messages, some SMS messages and lots of rudeness.

I would like to confess that today I have:

  • Joined a conference call without introducing myself.

At work is one thing – but what about at home!

Today I was interested to read an article in the New York Times titled – Quality Time, Redefined. This article starts by describing a scene that could, on many occasions be my house:

Ms. Vavra, a cosmetics industry executive in Manhattan, looked up from her iPad, where she was catching up on the latest spring looks at Refinery29.com, and noticed that her husband, Michael Combs, was transfixed, streaming the N.C.A.A. men’s basketball tournament on his laptop. Their son, Tom, 8, was absorbed by the Wii game Mario Kart on the widescreen television. Their daughter, Eve, 10, was fiddling with a game app called the Love Calculator on an iPod Touch. “The family was in the same room, but not together,” Ms. Vavra recalled.

The sites and the technology is generally different, but the comment “The family was in the same room, but not together” certainly rings true.

At a quick count there are at least 12 different screens in the household – and there’s only 4 of us. There are occasions when each of us has retreated to one or more of our screens and our level of interaction with the rest of the family is minimal. We might be physically in the same place, but our heads are in completely different places.

It’s a really interesting article with thoughts from celebrities, academics and medics alike:

Joanne Cantor, a professor emerita and a director of the Center for Communication Research at the University of Wisconsin, suggests it’s almost as if adults and older children are reverting to a form of “parallel play,” the developmental stage when toddlers sit beside each other in silence, playing with toys of their own. Even in the very recent past, when family members would be watching TV together, she said, “We all had conversations during the commercials, even if it was just to say, ‘Wasn’t that stupid?’ ”

It’s not all doom and gloom though, there are lots of thoughts on how this type of interaction might be a good thing.

Here’s some of our experiences, good and bad.

  • We have texted the children to get them to come down from their rooms for dinner. It’s a whole load easier than shouting around the house trying to communicate through the various other noise distractions.
  • On a number of occasions we have Skyped our son (while he’s away at University) from a laptop in the kitchen. We place the laptop in a corner where he used to sit while we made dinner. It’s not a full intensive face-to-face conversation, it makes the chatting much easier.
  • I have IMed one or other member of the family, when they were in the same room, in order to get their clear attention.
  • On a couple of occasions we have missed phone calls because we were each so deeply engaged in our thing that we hoped someone else would answer it.
  • We quite regularly participate in “have you seen this” conversations around one or other screen. This includes discussing and parallel commenting on Facebook.

Like many of these things the challenge is to keep the technology in balance. We don’t allow any technology at the dinner table and, whenever possible, have dinner together. Only last night we decided to watch a movie together and it felt great.It took us ages to agree what the movie was, and we streamed it, but we all watched the same movie.

I still think, though, that it’s going to become a huge issue for society to deal with as people try to come to terms with a situation they haven’t been trained for. One of the biggest challenges is going to be addiction including Information Addiction.

I’m interested to know what others do. Do you have some rules that help you to keep things in check?

Facebook – Reducing the Noise and Losing the Interest

As part of my return to online life after my decontamination over the holidays I went through my Facebook wall and marked anything and everyone I wasn’t really interested in and clicked: “Hide all posts by…”

This had the effect of significantly reducing the number of updates on my wall. It also had a more significant impact – it removed much of the interest too.

I’m not talking about real interest.

I’m talking about the interest I give to all of those times I’ve found myself looking at photos of someone I vaguely know with their dog, cat, budgie, etc.

I’m talking about the interest I give to all of those petty conversations between people who should really be excluded from using a keyboard by virtue of the way in which they waste everyone else’s time.

I’m talking about all of the interest I show to status update messages from the applications that people are using because they don’t have anything better to do.

In short – I lost interest because I significantly reduced the “variable interval reinforcement schedule” of Facebook.

Try it someday you might actually enjoy it.

Limited Connectivity Week – Lessons Learnt

Last week was a week’s holiday for me, and I used it as an opportunity to limit my connectedness for a week.

This meant that I turned my BlackBerry off, completely.

Twitter was not updated or consulted

Facebook was ignored, apart from the updates my family gave me as part of the week’s conversations.

It couldn’t be a completely disconnected week because I had some thing I needed to do that required online access (buying beds), and I checked my personal email a couple of times, partly to get updates on the things I had ordered.

By Friday it felt good, but I was surprised by the withdrawal experience that I went through.

I have a basic mobile phone on pay-as-you-go for personal use, so that I can turn the BlackBerry off, but still be contactable by the family.

At the beginning of the week I found myself repeatedly checking this phone even though I knew that there wasn’t anything on it, and I knew there was nothing on it because I was with everyone who had the number of that phone.

When I started the laptop up I found myself going through an inbuilt routine which included checking Facebook and Twitter. I had to consciously choose not to go there.

I also found myself worrying about whether I was missing something ‘important’ on my BlackBerry. Now I’m back in the office it’s time to see whether anything was really that ‘important’ or whether it’s all blown over while I’ve been away. The two important phone calls that I’ve already had this morning would lead me to believe that things have survived just fine without me.

Going forward it’s definitely time to place some clear limits around the levels of connectedness. Prior to my holiday I was already limiting the number of updates on twitter, and I was consciously limiting the updates in my Facebook News Feed to ones that I might actually be interested in.

On the flip side, I’ve decided that there are a few places where I’m not being as vocal as I should be, and this blog is one of them.

I don’t often quote the Bible on this blog, but my Proverb for the day seems very apt:

The more talk, the less truth;
the wise measure their words.

Proverbs 10:19

Information, Information, Information

I really enjoyed today’s infographic from Flowtown showing just how much information we are going to be creating in the future.

  • There are 65 million tweets every day
  • More than 70% of the Digital Universe in 2010 was generated by users.
  • Nearly 75% of the data stored in our digital universe is a copy.

Have we reached a world of infinite information?

Scan Reading – Summary Reading

I have a confession to make, I rarely read all of a document.

Jimmy and Granddad visit Alnwick GardensThere, I’ve said it, it’s out in the open.

Why should I? It’s rare that the whole of a document, or to that matter, an email or a blog, has been written wholly with me in mind.

It’s been written to communicate something, so I need to be able to read enough of the document to understand what is being communicated, to the level that I need to understand it.

It’s not a productive use of my time to read all of a document when I’ve understood what needs to be understood by only reading part of it.

I’m sorry if that sounds a bit harsh, but it is the reality of the world in which I live.

It’s a skill that has been born out of necessity. In the technical industry people don’t generally rank too highly on the spectrum of brevity. It’s much more likely that people will say too much than not enough.

Dilbert.com

One of the first lesson I learnt in summary reading was that you can’t get a summary of a document from the section title Introduction and certainly not from the section titled Executive Summary. I always thought it was a rather cruel trick to expect people who have not been executives to know what an executive might want to know about in a summary – assuming, of course, that a Technical Executive wants to read the same summary as a Project Executive or Finance Executive.

The need to understand a document at the summary level is one reason why I still print out quite a lot of documents. There have been all sorts of advances in screen technology and displays, but I still haven’t found one that allows me to flick through a document, forwards and backwards,

I wrote a bit more about this in an earlier post on scan reading.

Knowing that most of you haven’t even got this far I’ll finish there.

Scan Reading – Pre Classify

If there was one skill I would teach people it would be the ability to scan read, but there is an important skill prior to that – pre-classification.

Chatworth with the FamilyThe people who will succeed in the knowledge age will be those people who can assimilate huge amounts of information, being able to understand what is important and what is not.

It isn’t possible even today to read all of the information that is made available to us, and we shouldn’t even be trying. I know of many people who, myself included, can’t even properly read all of the email that they are sent each day, and I for one don’t even bother trying.

But I do scan read every one of the hundreds of emails, the hundreds of blogs, twitter and facebook.

I don’t find these numbers overwhelming, or a burden. I have a routine, and a system that shows me what is important and allows me to fly through what is not important.

A significant part of that system is the pre-classification system.

Pre-classification is all about efficient use of your minds ability to process things. The minds is much more efficient at repeatedly processing similar things. It’s not so efficient at switching the processing between different types of information. If we had to work our way through a set of activities we would naturally split them down into groups of things and then tackle a group at a time – that’s what the pre-classification system does with information. There’s no way that we would switch between ironing and washing the pots – iron a shirt, wash a pot, iron some trousers, wash a port – and yet that’s exactly what we expect our brain to do with information.

Every email client I know has a rules engine of some description that allows you to pre-classify emails based on where they have come from or on their content. But I see so few people using them. This engine might just be your life saver.

In my scan-reading system all of the emails from expenses, from travel, from corporate communications, from marketers and newsletters get classified before I’ve even seen them. I’ll still scan read them, but that’s all they are going to get. Doing this allows me to handle them in bulk. There’s only one piece of information I care about in the emails from the expenses systems – and, as it happen, it’s the last line that says “status”. As long as this doesn’t say “rejected” I’m fine. Having a set of similar emails to review allows me to apply the same routine to each one, which is much more efficient than switching between email types.

Chatworth with the FamilyThe classification system works in my blog reader to (which happens to be FeedDemon). I fly through the updates of pictures that come through from flick because I’m really looking to see if there is anything particularly interesting. I know which these blogs are because they are in a folder called unsurprisingly “pictures”. The “colleagues” category, though, get much more attention, I want to give the people I work with more time than a high level scan.

Same with twitter and facebook pre-classify and then scan read.

For twitter, TweetDeck is invaluable for this, I care that the column from colleagues has been updated, I will rapidly skim through “all friends” list. They don’t necessarily say anything any more profound, it’s just that I care more about what they have to say than I do about Dave Gorman or Jason Manford, or even MC Hammer.

I’m slightly stretching the point on facebook though, because I don’t get many status updates as I’ve turned most of them off. This then means that I can scan through what’s there without having to work out whether I care or not.

Go on try it out – remember, this skill could be essential to your future job prospects.

I’ll talk about the actual process of scan reading another time.