IT worse than aviation for carbon emissions – nearly

Jimmy and Grandad help with the wordsAccording to a new report from an organisation called Global Action Plan the ICT sector is about to overtake the aviation industry when it comes to CO2 emissions (I hadn’t heard of them before now so I’m not vouching for their pedigree, but they look genuine).

There are more than one billion computers on the
planet, and the worldwide ICT sector is responsible
for around 2% of man made CO2 each year – a similar
figure to the global airline industry. In the UK, there are
an estimated 10 million office PCs; and ICT equipment
accounts for roughly 10% of the UK’s total electricity
consumption.

The ICT sector is growing at a faster rate than the
aviation industry. In 2006, 48% more data storage
capacity was sold than in the previous year, compared
to a 3% increase in UK air travel passengers in the same
period. The impact of the sector is starkly illustrated
through the following statistics.

  • A medium-sized server has a similar carbon footprint
    to an SUV achieving 15 miles to the gallon.
    Servers also require as much energy to cool them
    as they directly consume.
  • 1,000 PCs left on 24/7 without any power save
    settings activated will consume up to £70,000 of
    electricity per year and for every unit of electricity
    consumed, around another half unit is required to
    dissipate the heat generated.
  • If 20% of European business travel was replaced by
    teleconferencing, around 25 million tonnes of CO2
    could be saved each year.
  • In 1980 before the introduction of the PC, world office
    paper consumption averaged 70 million tonnes a year
    – by 1997 it had more than doubled to almost 150
    million tonnes.
  • In the UK, 120 billion pieces of paper are printed
    every year, the manufacture of which emits 1.5
    million tonnes of CO2 before taking into account the
    impact of the manufacture of printing equipment and
    ink and the energy consumed by printers.
  • Each year 125 million computers are taken out of
    circulation worldwide and most of these end up in
    landfill sites (a problem addressed by the introduction
    of the European WEEE directive in 2007).
  • Manufacturing one PC requires 1.7 tonnes of raw
    materials and water and consumes over 10 times its
    own weight in fossil fuels.

Some interesting headline numbers there. headline numbers tend to make me skeptical though, I’m not entirely convinced by the growth parallel in the above extract – 48% more disk storage doesn’t need 48% more power. I’ve not had chance to read the whole report though, so it may be that the headlines mask the real detail.

I’m not saying that the problem isn’t real though. Today I am looking at a solution for a customer which will have huge amounts of redundancy because the service levels are very high. All of this redundancy will be consuming power all of the time, but delivering no value other than to be ready to take the load of the active servers. It could all be in some kind of “stand-by” mode, but the technology isn’t there to allow us to do it. It’s this kind of thing that we need to start resolving. There are a lot of things we could do, but there seems to be little urgency to get it done, even though initiatives like Energy Star have been running for a very long time.

What with this, the Child Benefit CD fiasco, and other major IT project problems we need to start getting our act together before we become completely demonised in the eyes of the British public. I also think that there is a growing  problem with people of my age experiencing work related health issues from 20+ years sat in front of a screen and keyboard. It reminds me a bit of the problems we have experienced with asbestos workers and could be just as expensive to fix.

Technorati tags: ,

Discover more from Graham Chastney

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 thoughts on “IT worse than aviation for carbon emissions – nearly”

  1. We all could point to unused capacity in data centre and offices which are left running, the “do not switch off running script” signs on machines for weeks on end. Like driving I think we could save a lot of CO2 just with changes in the style we use IT equipment, then with time better server, virtualisation and datacentre design will further reduce the CO2 footprint. I also think we need to highlight the areas where IT can reduce footprint by supporting home working or conferencing services reducing travel.

    Like

  2. We could also switch to a green tarrif for our electricity. Also as a home worker my PCs heat my office through the winter, so I don’t need the heating on during the day.

    Like

  3. Just the headlines show this is a much more complex problem than some like to paint it with their “carbon credits” cop-out!
    If we are really serious about dealing with this as an issue, we need a big effort in education and creating a feeling of responsibility.
    Maybe promoting home working could help, would people really leave their PC and monitor on all night, with no power management (yes I see this every day!), if they were paying the electricity bill?

    Like

Leave a reply to Stu Downes Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.