Over the weekend Microsoft released a Beta of System Center Capacity Planner from my point of view this is actually a very big step.
For some time now Microsoft have published best-practice type papers, but have relied heavily on the hardware vendors to provide the sizing information. In my experience this has lead to a situation where one of two things happen. If you get all of your hardware from one vendor then you get a nice neatly packaged answer; if you are in a multi-vendor hardware environment then you get a story which is optimised at each layer of the solution. The example that Exchange environments always bring out is the one of storage. If the storage vendor is different to the server vendor then Microsoft will be no help at all and the storage vendor will give you their optimised solution, as will the server vendor. Neither vendor wants to be the problem, so they both over-do it a bit to make sure they are OK. The only way out of this is to do lots of testing, but that’s very difficult and costs more than just buying the over-done hardware. The problem with over-done hardware isn’t the capital cost though, it’s the fact that it’s normally more complicated than the ‘good enough’ stuff and costs more to support.
The fact that Microsoft is stepping out from under this shadow is a big move – it would be even bigger if they were to attach some penalty system to it. A penalty system that works both ways – if we tell you to buy too much we’ll pay, if we tell you to buy too little we’ll pay. That would be a very courageous thing to do but would be a massive boost to customer confidence. It would also make Microsoft’s life easier to though. Why would anyone not buy the recommended hardware configuration and if the software actually works, people would then get services that didn’t require a call to Microsoft every week. Microsoft would then a chance to scale down its support organisation and its reputation for delivering reliable services would increase massively.
Perhaps I’m writing fantasy now and I should move on.











