Sick TC1100

DinanThe writing function on my TC1100 tablet stopped working. I wasn’t sure whether it was a broken pen (cheap) or a problem with the digitiser on the screen (expensive). Only having one TC1100 it was impossible to tell, so I waited until I could get together with Steve and swap pens.

Anyway, it’s not the pen.

Today a nice man, looking a little too much like Lurch, arrived to take it to the HP hospital. Hopefully it won’t be too long. I sure hope that it’s not terminal because I’m very fond of the little TC1100.

(It would have been collected earlier but I have been away on business).

 

Technorati tags: , ,

Motorola buys Good

Sudbury HallThe mobile technology market continues to consolidate, and Motorola seem to be doing most of it.

This time it’s Good Technology.

It’s an interesting buy because the primary benefit of Good has always been it’s cross-platform support.

Alongside other purchases (most significantly that of Symbol) Motorola would appear to be making a significant bet on the move to mobile. Interestingly they are trying to provide an integrated stack and not just consolidate devices (for instance). Enterprises like to be in a position where they can purchase everything from one vendor, and Motorola might just be that vendor in the future.

Technorati tags: , , ,

Next Generation Evaluation – Microsoft VHD Test Drive

CottageOver the years I have evaluated (played with) lots of different software products. One of the reasons I believe that desktop software took off was that it was easy to evaluate. There was no need to have lots of expensive hardware available, you could just stick it on your PC and see whether it did what you wanted it to do,and whether it looked nice.

Server software is more difficult to evaluate, because it requires a server. The problem with much Microsoft software is that it is becoming increasing interlinked. All of this interlinking means that you don’t just need one server, you need a few. thankfully operating system virtualisation came to the rescue and allowed us all to run multiple server instances on one piece of hardware, but there was still a huge investment to be made in maintaining this environment.

Over the last few days Microsoft have provided some assistance to all of us testers by making a whole set of evaluation Virtual Hard Disk images available via the VHD Test Drive programme. The theory here is wonderful for anyone who evaluates server software. Instead of me having to create a set of server images, deploy all of the pre-requisite software and then finally get around to looking at the application I actually want to look at, I can download some images, start them in Virtual Server and then get straight into the evaluation.

Beyond that Microsoft are working with other vendors to get their software available via the same route.

“We expect more than 20 partners to begin distributing their software via the VHD Test Drive Program later this quarter, including Altiris, BEA Systems, Check Point, Citrix, CommVault, Dell, FullArmor, HP, Network Appliance, Platespin, Portlock, Quest Software, SourceCode Technology Holdings, Symantec and UGS.”

I have a few reservations. If I’m evaluating software I do like to get into the nuts-and-bolts of how the software is installed and configured. You need to trust that the vendors have delivered their software in a standard way and that the VHD hasn’t been heavily customised. The other issue is that the evaluation period on some of the products is a bit stingy.

The big change to come, though, will be the availability of software for production use via this route.

The Commercialisation of Open Source

Autumn TreeYesterday Novell and Microsoft make an announcement of a partnership. Previously Oracle made an announcement about support for Red Hat.

It would seem from these announcement that the next wave of commercialisation of a sector of Open Source has begun. Simon Phipps of Sun had an interesting angle on the story.

I have to admit that I don’t understand all of the wheels within wheels here. The complexity is the issue though. Each time something like this happens it creates confusion and most corporates hate confusion.

The people that really get hurt by the confusion are the small organisations seeking to make their presence felt – I’d include Novell and Red Hat in this. Oracle and Microsoft are the real winners here with HP, IBM and Sun doing very nicely too.

It’s really difficult being in the middle. The small business and personal users of Open Source software don’t want to pay for support, the larger organisations need stability and will keep, for the most part, with tried and trusted suppliers.

Red Hat and Novel, if you want to survive you need to create stability and remove all the confusion.

Why?

Pendle HillI haven’t written much lately so I thought I would get back into the swing of things with a pointless post with a pointless question.

I often ask the question “why?”

Why would you want to do that?

Why doesn’t something work right?

And then I see things like the device that uses waves to “print” on the surface of water and the “why’s” just come flooding out.

There are so many of them that I can’t be bothered to write them down. Nice technology though.