Making Decisions

Lilacland: Jimmy and Grandad meet some of the locals

Another day when articles come together.

Jeffrey Philips has an interesting article on decision making.

Church of the Customer has an interesting article on organisations that treat remote operations as ‘dumb terminals’.

Both of these articles focus on the current organisational cultures and constructs that make the process of decision making very difficult.

Jeffrey highlights four areas which compound the problems, four areas that I have seen in many organisations:

  • Who has to be involved in the decision?
  • How will we justify the decision?
  • Does the decision align with corporate and strategic objectives?
  • What happens if things don’t go so well?

Anyone who has worked in a large organisation will know that the answer to each of those questions has its own peculiar difficulties.

In many matrix organisations it seems that the answer to the ‘who’ question is ‘everyone’. Everyone wants a finger in the pie, everyone wants to contribute (and take away) and no-one is in a position to decide. It is this first problem that makes all other problems insurmountable.

The Church of the Customer article highlights decision making as an issue too. In their case the issue is about autonomy at the right level. Again ‘who has to be involved in the decision?’.

As organisations become more ‘virtual’ I can only see this issue getting worse. It’s bad enough when the question of who needs to be involved includes a broad spectrum of your own organisation; when you extend this out to another organisation then it just gets worse.

The best place I have ever worked is within a small office where we had a small team that was almost totally autonomous and was well focussed on a small set of priorities. We made decision quickly and we galloped our way through our priorities. Organisations need to realise this and focus on building those small-well focussed-autonomous teams if they don’t want to become a talking-shop which never makes any decisions.

Perhaps virtual organisations will be the answer to the problem eventually. Many people will be much happier when they don’t have to make any decisions themselves and give someone else the problem .

Communicating: What Should You Expect

Adventures in Teenbed-Ageroom: Turn it down someone, please!!!

Creating Passionate Users has an interesting article today on the success of communication techniques.

When trying to communicate to a crowd it looks like the best you can get is about 30%, and that’s if you put something in their hands and communicate via written or video media.

This rings true with my own experience. I have been involved in a number of large projects that have implemented some new technology something (email, desktop, etc.). In each case the implementation has gone slower then the project managers expected and in every case the project managers have complained that the end user has not done what they were asked to do.

If a project requires the end user to do something – the best you should expect is that 30% of them will do it. If you start with that number you will build a project that will at least be realistic about the effort that is going to need to be expended overcoming this limitation. If you expect that only 30% will do what you want them to do then you will realise how important it is to have a project that requires the end user to do nothing whatsoever; any dependency on the end user will just slow you down.

Microsoft and Softricity: Licensing

The calming brook

A lot of comment on Microsoft’s intention to buy Softricity (Steve Richards, Brian Madden, others)

My own viewpoint can be summarised like this:

  • Technology: Great
  • User Experience: Great
  • Licensing: Problem

Both Steve and Brian touch on the licensing issue. The benchmark that everyone in the market works to when it comes to licensing is Microsoft. Whatever Microsoft are doing everyone else falls into line with. The Microsoft licensing engine is dominated by licensing that is installation based. In other words, you pay for every installation.

In order to accommodate the ‘terminal server’ type applications the pay-per-installation scenario has been fudged a bit to state that a license is required for each device capable of running the application on the terminal server.

Application virtualisation only becomes truly valuable where the licensing terms are flexible and fluid allowing a pay-per-use type model.

The pressure is on to make this change, but until Microsoft makes a dramatic change no-one else will see the need to. Moving to a pay-per-use model would require a huge shift for Microsoft and significantly impact the revenue from enterprise licensing and from Office; both of them things that they will be unwilling to tinker with too much.

Without a shift in licensing mechanisms application virtualisation is stick.

Tags: , ,

It’s time to deliver VALUE Mr. CIO

This is high

Michael Platt has picked up on some research done by Gartner stating that IT must start demonstrating value – not just cost reduction.

CIOs need to establish a track record of creating value faster than reducing IT costs by 2009. CIOs are now expected to provide high-quality, secure and cost-effective services. CIOs must deliver a record of high performance to establish their position and contribution in the organization. To do this, CIOs will need to create business value faster than the market and technology can reduce IT and business costs.

I’m just adding my voice to the chorus here. The primary role of IT needs to be the delivery of VALUE and not just the reduction of cost of the existing.

We’ll see whether reports from people like Gartner have the same effect they did when they made created a huge hullabaloo about TCO some years back. A hullabaloo I have to say has enabled IT organisations to reduce cost and also to massively reduce the value. High value and high cost has been replaced in most organisations with lower cost and lower value.

The cost centred thinking may have been appropriate in the last economic cycle. As the cycle turns another corner it’s no longer appropriate, it’s time to think value. Value thinking will require a huge metamorphosis for most IT organisation and many won’t be given the opportunity. What I see happening is that businesses will focus parts of their organisation on innovation. It will be the innovation function that drives expenditure on IT. The innovation expenditure will be focussed directly on creating innovation and on supporting the innovations that they develop, this will normally result in some IT expenditure but probably not by the IT function. The IT organisation will get given the technology that supports the innovation only when it is no longer innovation and requires a run-and-maintain, cost-centred approach.

Engineering organisation have worked this way for years; the IT organisation rarely supports the IT for the engineering part of the organisation. The the engineering function fund and normally support the technology themselves because they need to be closely intimate to the value it delivers, because value it the primary driver and not cost. Having the IT function supporting the engineering function normally has the effect of slowing down the engineering, the same would be true for the innovation function.

If the IT function only looks after run-and-maintain why bother having an IT function. Most organisation let someone else run-and-maintain their buildings, why should the run-and-maintain of IT be different.

Tags: ,,

How civilised is your organisation?

Adventures in Teenbed-Ageroom: A strange collection

There are a number of reoccuring themes on this blog, it’s not deliberate it’s just what I’m interested in. One of them is the workplace of the future and that depends upon work culture more than technology.

Slow leadership points to a quiz on the subject of organisation civility:

 “How civilised is your organisation? Can it pass the Slow Leadership test for a working environment beneficial to the people who inhabit it? Now you have a chance to find out.”

I did the score for the organisation I work in, but I’m not willing to share the results .

“We are continually faced with a series of great opportunities brilliantly disguised as insoluble problems.”

John W. Gardner 

From my perspective the organisations that are going to succeed, particularly in the West World, are going to be those organisation that focus on creativity and innovation. Creativity and innovation requires civility in an organisation.

Where Microsoft Listening?

Wow, what a set-up

The other day myself and a colleague were in a session with a Microsoft representative talking about requirements for the desktop beyond Windows Vista. We had a long conversation about application delivery and the need to make it much, much better. We used Softricity as an example. Today Microsoft announced an intention to buy Softricity.

Perhaps I have more power than I think I do .

Tags: ,

Your Identity in their Hands

This is high

Slightly off the beaten track for me.

Kim Cameron picks up on a publication by a leading IBM Researcher Michael Osbourne regarding the proposed architecture of the UK ID Cards scheme.

Kim’s strongest words are these:

The resulting central database, where everything is connected and visible to everything else, is as vulnerable as a steel ship with no compartments – one perforation, and the whole thing goes down.

The starting point for a security thinker is that there will be perforations.

As a UK citizen this sounds like a problem to me. If mine and everyone else’s identity is lost (sunk) how do we ever get it back?

There are experienced Identity professionals out there – why doesn’t our government appear to be listening to them?

And don’t tell me that the ID Card is optional – because in practice it isn’t. If I have to have one to get a new passport then it isn’t optional for anyone with a job in any multi-national because travelling abroad comes with the territory.

Tags: , ,

User Experience Thinking: Project Orange

Adventures in Teenbed-Ageroom: Grandad gives Jimmy a lift up

A reasonable amount of buzz has be flowing around today about Project Orange.

Project Orange is described by the WinFS Team Blog at:

The killer app for getting users organised

Project Orange is about the creation of an application that demonstrates the reason why WinFS is the replacement for the file system. But more than that, why it’s something that truly liberates data from the constraints of the application.

The file system has been a mainstay of the corporate and desktop infrastructure for a very long time now. If it’s going to change then the change can’t be about the technology. The change has to be about the user experience, enabling them to do things they have never done before in ways that feel more familiar than the file system today.

The WinFS iWish Video is quite interesting to watch – not a ‘file’ in sight.

Tags: , ,   

More on Questions..

Jimmy and Grandad take a walk on the wild side

Questions – it’s becoming a bit of a theme . Perhaps I should actually write something that helps people rather than point them somewhere else? But then that would be encouraging answers rather than questions .

Adrian Savage in his Breakthrough Manifest (Part 2) highlights the important of questions with these two encouragements:

  • Forget looking for answers. Questions are so much more useful. Questions lure you on, poke and prod you to discover more. Questions are like bits of grit in a bed: they stop you from resting comfortably with what you think you already know. Answers are a dead end. If you know the answer, there’s nowhere else to go.   
  • Become a specialist in asking stupid questions. They’re the very best ones. Worry about the answer, not the question. Lots of people never get beyond an initial state of confusion because they’re afraid to ask what seems to be a foolish question. Innocent people with a true desire to learn have the greatest chance of spectacular success. Who learns best and fastest? Little children. Your target must be to go through life learning at the same rate as an infant.  

There’s more great stuff over there so go and have a look.