links for 2006-06-21

links for 2006-06-20

Will Bill Gates have to do a Steve Jobs

Where is Grandad now?

Quick history lesson of Apple Computers, now mostly forgotten.

Once upon a time (1976) two people (Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs) designed the Apple I and started Apple computers.

Apple Computers grew quite nicely for some time until in the fullness of time (1985) Apple decided that it would prefer to go into the wilderness than follow its leader (Mr. Jobs). Preferring the wilderness to himself the Mr. Jobs decided to leave Apple and established NeXT.

Apple wandered in the wilderness for 12 long years until the leader (Mr. Jobs) was brought back (1997).

With it’s leader back in place Apple left the wilderness and started to grow and build again.

The rest is a history that is visible in the ears of millions of people.

I wonder whether the announcement that Microsoft’s talisman leader (Bill Gates) is moving aside will be a replay of the Apple history.

There are very few IT organisations which have successfully moved from being first-generation organisation to being second and third-generation organisations. By that I mean, that there aren’t many IT organisation which have moved beyond the leaders that established the organisation without going through some form of wilderness experience. There are an increasing number of organisation that are going to have to do it though.

Here are some similarities I have noticed. Remember: “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

So what are the similarities with Apple (and other organisations) that might suggest that Microsoft will go into the wilderness – and what are the differences which might suggest the opposite.

Some would argue that Microsoft is already in the wilderness and that would be a similarity with Apple. Jobs didn’t leave Apple because it was all going well, he left because there were problems and he wanted to make changes that others wouldn’t follow him into. That’s where I think that this particular similarity breaks-down; I don’t think Bill is leaving because he isn’t getting the buy-in from his management team.

While in the wilderness Apple was lead by John Sculley, the business man to Jobs’s technology savvy (some would argue). With Bill Gates stepping aside at Microsoft it could be viewed that the person taking over is Steve Ballmer – the business minded one. But is Steve Ballmer really the one taking over, or has Microsoft been planning this for some time and managed to build a new ‘brain trust’ already. I suspected that when Microsoft bought Groove that it was more for the people than for the product. With Ray Ozzie moving into the Chief Software Architect role that suspicion seems to be confirmed.

Steve Jobs left and established NeXT Computers; Bill Gates is leaving to do something more interesting that is primarily outside IT. Jobs’ NeXT was always being compared to what Apple were doing, it was bit of nagging sore. I doubt anything Bill Gates does with the Bill and Melissa Gates Foundation will be directly comparable to anything Microsoft does, and they are keeping him there as Chairman to make sure it’s not a problem anyway.

I’m sure there are a lot of other parallels, but these seem to me to be the major ones. I don’t know enough about the history of other organisations to make sensible comment, but I do know that transition from first-generation leadership to second-generation is very, very difficult for any organisation. Time doesn’t stand still for IT executives and it’s inevitable that all of the remaining first-generation leaders will need to transition to second-generation leaders sooner rather than later. The transition to second-generation leadership is an issue which Apple are going to have to face all over again.

See Microsoft Monitor for more comment.

Do I think that Bill Gates will have to do a Steve Jobs and come back to sort it all out? I doubt it.

links for 2006-06-17

Count Your Blessings #70: Nostomania

Stone Circle

One of the mind games I try to play in order to keep my brain active is to try and learn a new word every day. I do this by subscribing to wordsmith.org A.Word.A.Day. I don’t always remember them because, to be honest, sometimes the word is not one I’m likely to use in my normal life.

I’ve been away on business this week. I left on Tuesday and returned late Thursday. On Wednesday the word for the day was nostomania.

Nostomania: An overwhelming desire to return home or to go back to familiar places.

I’m not sure I was suffering an ‘overwhelming desire’ but when I am away the desire to be home is always there.

I count it a real blessing that my home is somewhere that I actually want to return to.

Thing may not always be rosy at home, but I’d rather be here than anywhere else on earth.

But what makes a home – a home. It’s not the building, or even the things in it, it is the people inside and the people near by.

User Experience Thinking: Sametime 7.5: Multi-way chat enhancement

InsideLotus highlights one of those features that will be in Sametime 7.5 that we all have wanted for some time.

“Allow new chat invitees to see history when they enter the chat” – brilliant .

I have been involved in hundred of ad-hoc meetings that have added someone into the chat part way through. Every time this happens the meeting has to slow down while we get the new attendee up to speed. Now the new attendee can get up to speed quickly and completely.

Tags: ,

Smashie and Nicey Return to Blogs

I’ve been listening to a lot of podcasts recently. I’m really starting to appreciate this way of consuming information.

One thing has struck me though – Smashie and Nicey never went away, they just moved over to podcasts .

(Wikipedia on Smashie and Nicey)

Music Streaming: Pandora and Launch

Lilacland: Jimmy and Grandad try to get to the top of Mount Clothes

When you work from home it’s nice to have music on in the background but it can mean that you get bored of your own music .

In order to overcome the boredom issue I’ve now tried both Pandora and Launch from Yahoo. These are both streaming music services which allow you to build your own channel and define the music you like. They both then use this information to play the music you have said you like, but also music they think you might like.

I liked both of them, but have some observations :

  • Pandora is only available to people in the US – it’s not Pandora’s fault it’s down to the license they can get from the music industry.
  • Launch has a low, medium and high quality option – the medium quality doesn’t sound (to me) as good as the Pandora format. The high quality might sound better but I’m not willing to pay to find out.
  • Pandora allows you to say whether you like some music or not, Launch has a star rating system on the artist, the album and the track. I prefer the Launch approach because it seems to mean that stuff a really like gets played more often.
  • Pandora, being only available in the US has a more US biased set of music – that’s fine when I’m in the mood for US music, but not when I want something more UK biased. Launch has better UK music coverage.
  • Pandora doesn’t appear to have any classical music.
  • Launch times-out on the free version far earlier than Pandora does.
  • Launch has adverts – Pandora doesn’t.
  • Launch has videos too – not that it makes much difference to me.
  • Launch has a better way of showing ‘people who liked this music also liked this’.

Like I say – I like both of them but tend to prefer…Pandora .

Vista Rebooted

I rebooted my Vista Tablet today – because ti pulled down an update which required a reboot.

This was the first time I had rebooted my Tablet with Vista Beta 2 since I built it and put the current set of applications on it. That was 11 days ago, not remarkable but interesting.

I’m still using it as my reading and research device so the number of applications is small.

I’ve spent the last two days in back-to-back meetings and OneNote has been great.

The only problem I have had has been the Feeddemon sometimes starts two instances (for some reason) and then gets confused. If I close them down and restart it everything is fine again.

Tags: , , ,

links for 2006-06-16

Ed Brill Responds

Ed Brill responded in an email to my last post – thanks for the reply Ed.

One of Ed’s points was that the last post came across as a bit arrogant – this wasn’t the intention at all. I was trying to work out why I was personally frustrated, perhaps as Ed suggests it’s the way the British communicate.

links for 2006-06-15