Exchange 12 – Storage

One of the things I get involved in is the configuration of storage that will be supporting Microsoft Exchange (and Notes too sometimes).

This normally requires a good deal of effort. Why? Because it requires a mindset change.

Must designers are worrying about the size of the system that they are implementing. The primary challenge for Notes and Exchange is normally performance.

Today the requirements for Exchange 12 became a bit clearer. It doesn’t help if you if you have a deployment going today, but might help you to plan in the future.

IOPS might not be such a big issue in the future, but the future isn’t here yet.

Tags: , ,

Computer Sciences to “Restructure”

For someone who works for a large services organisation this is interesting news.

“For some time it has been apparent to us, and to other companies in our industry, that there is excess capacity in certain geographies, particularly Europe,” Honeycutt said. “After lengthy consideration, we have decided that this is an appropriate time to deal with the issue through a restructuring; this action is designed to enhance shareholder value regardless of any strategic alternatives we may explore.”

Tags:

Microsoft ‘Motion’

Jimmy and Grandad struggle to get back into the house

Channel 9 today has a video on Motion, it was one of the topics at the Architecture Insight Conference.

There’s also a couple of ARCasts to.

If you are an IT Architect then Motion will be of interest to you. If your a technical person it won’t.

Motion is about building a bridge between business architecture and IT architecture it does this via building a bridge between business services and IT services. That’s right Microsoft doing business architecture.

It looks really interesting as an approach but there isn’t that much collateral available online today because it’s still in incubation and ‘motion’ is still a code name.

Tags: , , , ,

Microsoft Vitual Server Enterprise Edition R2 Becomes Free and Gets Linux Support

Jimmy and Grandad struggle to get back into the house

Apparently Virtual Server R2 Enterprise Edition is now free. This follows on from a similar announcement from VMWare. I’m sure though that Microsoft’s argument will be that they aren’t following, rather that Longhorn will make virtualisation a commodity and they are just bringing the benefit in early.

Oh, and because it’s the Enterprise Edition that’s free, it effectively makes the Standard Edition a redundant product.

They also announced that Linux would now be ‘supported’ as a ‘host’ at LinuxWorld (where else).

Will this make a huge difference to most IT users – I don’t think so. But it will probably make a huge difference to a whole load of testers and developers.

Will this make a difference to VMWare? Probably. Although the VMWare product set is more mature, the challenge is whether people will initially choose a free product from a company they already deal with (Microsoft) or an organisation they don’t (VMWare). That makes it more difficult for VMWare to move people up to the full featured ESX product. And if people are making a choice for a development project today will they be expecting to deploy it on Longhorn server anyway.

On a slightly different question, if ‘virtual’ is the normal way of doing it is it still ‘virtual’?

via Adam’s Mindspace, Clive Watson, John Howard

Tags: , , ,